Landscape and Design

�鶹��Ƶ architecture students pay homage to Trinity Bellwoods in zine

geoff.vendeville — Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:30:20 +0000

�鶹��Ƶ architecture students pay homage to Trinity Bellwoods in zine

geoff.vendeville Tue, 04/04/2017 - 15:30

Cutline

�鶹��Ƶ architecture students Marienka Bishop-Kovac and Phat Le grew up near Trinity Bellwoods Park but only met in university. They describe their experiences growing up in the neighbourhood in a new zine (photo by Geoffrey Vendeville)

Geoffrey Vendeville

Author legacy

Geoffrey Vendeville

Topic

City & Culture

Cities

�鶹��Ƶ

Architecture

urban

Daniels Faculty of Architecture

Landscape and Design

Subheadline

Marienka Bishop-Kovac and Phat Le write about local landmarks and reflect on the changing neighbourhood

When they walk around the Trinity Bellwoods neighbourhood, Marienka Bishop-Kovac and Phat Le often bump into familiar faces.

On a recent stroll, the �鶹��Ƶ architecture students, waved hello to a gallery owner and to Le's 80-year-old great uncle, who was on his way to play tennis.

But the students say the neighbourhood has changed considerably since their childhood. Fancy restaurants and boutiques have moved in, replacing neighbourhood fixtures such as Superior Sausage, a butcher shop which opened in 1937 and closed just four years ago.

Bishop-Kovac and Le, who grew up a few blocks away from each other but only met at the University of Toronto, reflected on the evolution of the area in a zine titled I'M SO MAD.

Le's parents came to the city as refugees from Vietnam while Bishop-Kovac traces her family's roots to the former Czechoslovakia.

What are they “mad” about, exactly?

“We grew up around this area, and you start loving it. But then you realize that everyone is trying to push you out,” Le said.

Phat Le, seen here with his mom, My Nguyen, grew up in an apartment above his family's store Hong Phat Variety on Queen Street West near Ossington Avenue (photo by Geoffrey Vendeville)

He and Bishop-Kovac write about local landmarks that continue to endure – like the St. John's Lutheran Church where Bishop-Kovac's grandparents were married – and bygone landmarks – like the convenience store where Le and his grandma would stop for beef patties.

They are putting their memories into words to start a dialogue about gentrification, Bishop-Kovac said.

At the same time, they wrestle with the question of whether they are part of the problem: “It is a complex, emotional hypocrisy to try and process,” Bishop-Kovac writes. “I am so mad that this city has been destroying the landmarks of my childhoold, but I do love me some vegan quinoa onion rings.”

The students are planning at least two more issues this summer, one about Honest Ed's (R.I.P.) and another featuring other people's stories about the city.

�鶹��Ƶ News recently went on a trip down memory lane with them, chatting about landmarks in the neighbourhood.

Classic Variety

Le's family made friends with the owners of this convenience store, which is no more. Le has fond memories of stopping here on his way to school with his grandmother to buy beef patties. (All graphics are by Phat Le and Marienka Bishop-Kovac)

210 Ossington

“My dad used to go here to rent VCR of Vietnamese variety shows or Vietnamese dramas,” Le writes.

They would pick movies from a dusty catalogue of titles.

“I never got along with the owner's kid,” Le said, adding the kid was “probably a gemini.”

St. John's Lutheran Church

“This was the church my grandparents, who were political refugees, were married in, and I was baptized there,” Bishop-Kovac writes.

She also went there for Sunday school.

“I was part of a boy gang in Sunday school,” she says. “We would mostly run around the church playing hide and seek.” (The church is on Concord Avenue, a few blocks north of the Bellwoods area)

Superior Sausage

The old butcher shop was frequented by both Le's and Bishop-Kovac's families. Sausage, sauerkraut and raspberry syrup from the shop were always at Bishop-Kovac's dinner table at Easter and Christmas.

“Our traditional feast has altered in flavour as the ingredients are more challenging to acquire,” she writes.

Toronto Rail Deck: �鶹��Ƶ experts on the pros and cons

lanthierj — Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:10:32 +0000

Toronto Rail Deck: �鶹��Ƶ experts on the pros and cons

lanthierj Fri, 08/05/2016 - 11:10

Cutline

Artist's rendering of the proposed 8.5 hectacre park (images courtesy City of Toronto)

Noreen Ahmed-Ullah

Author legacy

Noreen Ahmed-Ullah

Topic

School of Public Policy and Governance

John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture

Landscape and Design

Subheadline

Why a city of towers needs a big downtown park but not at the cost of basic upgrades and repairs

A proposed 21-acre downtown Toronto park is being touted as a bold project that will help redefine the city. But will it?

The Rail Deck Park would be built over railway tracks – a detail that sparked instant comparisons to Chicago’s Millennium Park, which cost hundreds of millions of dollars

Mayor John Tory estimated the Toronto price tag as “tens of millions of dollars” per acre and said the city is talking with CN and Toronto Terminal Railways to secure the rights to the open space above the tracks for public use.

The city is also hoping to get funds from Ottawa, the province, developers and private donations to help pay for its signature park. City planners are saying the park, which will run from Bathurst Street to the Rogers Centre, will become a central destination for all Torontonians.

�鶹��Ƶ News spoke with Gabriel Eidelman, assistant professor at �鶹��Ƶ’s School of Public Policy and Governance, and Larry Richards, professor emeritus and former dean of the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design, about why Toronto needs this park – and whether it’ll ever get built.

Is having a downtown park a good idea? How will it help the city?

GE: I don’t think there’s any question a new downtown park is a good idea, particularly in this area, which has seen, and will continue to see, rapid population growth. Parks have enormous value, not only from a recreational perspective, but also economically (increased property values in the surrounding neighbourhood) and, of course, environmentally (cleaner air, less water runoff, cooler temperatures). The waterfront has several large park spaces, but most are not easily accessible by foot. This proposal would add 21 acres of new parkland — that’s about the size of 21 soccer fields! — within walking distance of thousands of Torontonians. The planning rationale is rock solid.

LR: Yes, having a large downtown park is a good idea. Toronto has become a city of towers with relatively high population density. To balance the density and the fact that people are living in smaller and smaller apartments, public open space is needed, particularly in the downtown core.

It is extremely important to continue developing the lakefront and the Toronto Islands, but this is not enough in terms of parkland. Just as Chicago has its extensive lakefront and generous public parks, and just as Manhattan has its extensive public waterfronts along the Hudson River and East River plus Central Park, Toronto should have multiple types of public parks. Also, this proposed park will enable public open space linkage – Railway Park, Under the Gardiner Park, Waterfront, Toronto Islands, etc…A larger, integrated "green vision" can emerge.

Read more about alumna Judy Matthews and Under the Gardiner

How is a rail deck park constructed?

GE: By creating a “deck” over the tracks with proper soundproofing and drainage to accommodate public access and landscaping. The engineering challenges are complex, but have been successfully overcome in many other cities. Millennium Park in Chicago, home of the famous “Bean” sculpture, is a well-known example.

(Below: photo of Bean sculpture by jotter@ via Flickr)

LR: In terms of constructing the deck, sophisticated engineering is required, and a park on a bridged-deck, spanning over rail tracks, is more expensive than creating a park on the ground. The new over-the-railway park must be designed by the best landscape architects and consulting experts that Toronto can find. Design excellence must be at the forefront of all of these discussions.

Are the cost estimates and projected time to construct realistic?

GE: The announcement did not include specific cost estimates or projected timelines. Both the mayor and the chief planner were noticeably vague in their comments. I suspect city staff have done considerable due diligence to date, but none of this research has so far been made public. We'll have to wait until a staff report is presented to City Council in September for further details.

LR: The preliminary rough estimates I've read about are based on Toronto's recent experience in constructing new parks and on similar projects elsewhere. So they have some credibility. But we know that, realistically, large and complex projects like this typically take twice as long and cost twice as much as first estimated. The City of Toronto does not have a great record in terms of timelines and costs. For example, the restoration and rejuvenation of Nathan Phillips Square took at least twice as long as expected and was over budget. Parts of the NPS project never got completed correctly at all, such as the Bay and Queen Street edges.

Should the city have prioritized other large-scale projects over this park?

LR: Generally speaking, Toronto's public realm is down-at-the-heels and poorly maintained.

Although the new downtown park is a good idea, it would be a shame if its realization negated the urgently needed repairs, upgrades, and maintenance for the public realm (parks, streets and roads, sidewalks, landscape, recreation amenities, etc.). As well, some of the outer, poorer districts are in dire need of better public space and more amenities. Simply stated, the cost and effort for a new grand park should not overwhelm and prevent the upgrading of the "everyday" public spaces throughout the entire city, which are currently second rate by international standards.

Will the park ever get built?

GE: The trite answer is, ask me again once the proposal is actually on paper. The realistic answer is, unlikely. I would love to be proven wrong, but I expect many political, legal, and financial roadblocks. For example, none of the existing landowners (CN and CP railways, as well as Metrolinx) were present at the announcement, which suggests that negotiations will not be easy. And even if political agreement is achieved, project costs will be substantial, in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars, with no obvious source of funding. At this point, the proposal is little more than just another item on the city’s long, $22 billion-list of unfunded capital projects.